Floating power plants have been around for a long time. In fact, one of the early units, the 30MW "Impedance" is still in operation
drawing board. Why the renewed interest in FPPs these past 15 years? The initial answer was the need to install fast, reliable
capacity in countries experiencing severe capacity shortages.
Countries in South East Asia, particularly the Philippines, South America and the Caribbean found themselves desperately short
of power as their economies expanded. This situation was due in large part to the long neglect of utility infrastructure and lack of
funding for such projects. Consequently, state-owned electrical utilities turned to the private sector for a quick fix and external
Build-Own-Transfer (BOT) contractual arrangements. Many of these contracts were signed with companies that offered power
generation barges, one of the few vehicles that would induce commercial financing for power-generating facilities in countries
that could not or would not provide sovereign guarantees of payment.
Delivered to the site, the FPP, already tested and ready for operation, required only to be attached to it's moorings,
fast track permitting process that mainly considered exhaust and thermal emissions. The need to overcome land use by
water borne transport and transfer, eliminating requirements for fuel trucks, pipelines and landslide storage.
FPPs were constructed during a flurry of opportunity in the early 90's using a variety of generating technologies. Since most
projects were fuel driven, the availability and cost of heavy fuel oil being prevalent, opportunity was created for medium and
slow speed diesel technology, which took the lion's share of all the early FPP projects. However, gas turbines were also
barge mounted for the first time during this period, in simple cycle form, using both aero derivative and industrial models
mainly operating on No. 2 diesel fuel.
While the barge mounting of aero derivative turbines followed techniques used in military installations, the installation of
large industrial turbines posed special challenges. These challenges mainly concerned the isolation of the turbine generator
set, designed to normally rest on a monolithic concrete block, from the hydrostatic and thermal induced movements of a
structural steel barge. Several different solutions were generated that isolate the turbine foundations from the barge
structures, while maintaining the rigidity required of the turbine manufacturer.
Complete combined cycle FPP delivered by ocean transport
Since the flurry of FPP construction in the 90's, the
pace has slowed, but the projects have tended
toward greater capacities and increased
sophistication.
In 2000, what is currently the largest FPP in the
world was installed in Mangalore, on the west
coat of India. The 220 MW combined cycle unit is
fitted with four LM 6000 turbine generator
packages, with chilled inlet air, each with a "Once
Thru" heat recovery steam generator and a 55
MW steam plant. This FPP was constructed in
record time in Korea and installed in a riverside
lagoon, where the design permits the facility to
vertical rise some 5 meters during the monsoon
season.
150 MW FPP for Orimulsion Fuel
220 MW Combined Cycle FPP at Site
The power barge is much like a ship transiting the oceans of the
world; it is a legal entity, with a flag, state and a home port
compliant with international regulations and operating under
maritime law. Under these circumstances, financial institutions felt
assured that the asset could be retrieved should the state utility not
meet it's obligations.
Financial issues aside, FPPs could be delivered quickly to meet
the urgent need for capacity. Assuming the availability of prime
movers, generators and other equipment, a 100 MW barge could
be delivered to site in less than 6 months. Site work can be
accomplished simultaneously with the construction of the barge in
a shipyard where greater control and efficiency of the installation of
machinery and equipment is possible than at a remote green field
site.
Fuels for FPPs have thus far been restricted to conventional petroleum based products ranging from heavy fuel oils to
naphtha and natural gas. The present high price for petroleum-based fuels and natural gas have prompted developers to
look to other fuels and different technologies to convert these fuels to electrical energy. Coal is now being considered as a
fuel for barge mounted circulating fluidized bed boilers and steam turbine generators and designs are in an advanced
state for nominal 100 MW units for installation in the U.S. Likewise, the use of relatively low cost Orimulsion, proven as a
fuel for medium speed diesel operations, is the basis for a planned 150 MW FPP for Asia. The necessary addition of flue
gas desulfurization (FGD) equipment on the barge adds to the complexity of design but all can be accommodated on an
FPP.
To date, FPPs have been limited to installation in locations that are not subjected to wave action or high currents. Heretofore, barge motions have not been tolerated in operation, the moorings restricting any movement other than vertically with the rise
and fall of rivers or the ebbs and flows of tides. However, the advent of an offshore FPP may have arrived, that utilizes
associated natural gas from offshore oil production. Designs are in progress for a 500 MW power plant that can be moored in
10,000 feet of water, 200 miles offshore. The combined cycle facility converts AC generation to DC for transmission through
subsea DC cables to shore where it is reconverted to AC for connection to the grid.
Modularized Coal Fired CFB FPP
500 MW Offshore FPP with DC transmission
The future for FPPs appears promising, whether destined to supply fast track electricity to power undeveloped countries or
transmission locked developed locations. Reducing the capital cost of small to medium capacity power plants by using
modular construction techniques in low labor cost shipbuilding facilities may be the wave of the future, as may the capability
to generate electricity in offshore locales.
PEI: April 2004
Are Non-Nuclear Floating Power Plants an Option for South Africa? By Keith Campbell Engineering News, February 15, 2008
While Russia could, in a few years, lease floating nuclear power plants to this country to help alleviate the current electricity
generation shortfall (see Engineering News February 1, 2008), South Africa could boost its power production even more
rapidly by using non-nuclear floating power plants (FPPs).
FPPs can be built very quickly. If the necessary power generation plant is available, a 100-MW unit could be assembled (barge designed and built, the generation plant installed) and delivered to the required location, in six months, according to
Waller Marine Incorporated president David B Waller.
Interestingly, Eskom is known to have acquired a power generation turbine from General Electric (GE) – this was built by GE
for another customer who then cancelled the order, allowing the South African utility to snap it up. But now Eskom is
pondering where to put it and how to provide its fuel supply – pipeline, railway tanker, or road tanker? Putting it on a barge
would speed things up considerably and solve the fuel supply problem – it could be delivered by hose from product tankers
(that is, tankers that transport refined fuels, not crude oil).
Also relevant to the South African situation is that FPP projects in rapidly growing emerging market countries have often involved
State-owned utilities turning to private-sector companies to supply both the FPP and the financing for the project. This is done
by signing power-purchasing agreements with the private-sector (often foreign) investors, using either build-own-operate or
build-own-transfer arrangements.
A fascinating aspect of FPPs is that they are legally equivalent to ships, not to terrestrial power stations. Each FPP is a legal
entity, with a home port, a country of registration, and a flag, operating under maritime law, and in compliance with international
regulations – hence, the fact that the 50-year-old 30-MW FPP mentioned earlier has a name.
To date, FPPs have all employed petroleum- based or natural-gas fuels, but in the last few years, coal has been under
consideration for 100-MW units intended for deployment in the US. Hitherto, FPPs had to be moored in sheltered locations,
protected from wave action or strong currents (tidal rises and falls are no problem), which suggests that places like Durban
Bay, Saldanha Bay, and Richards Bay might be the most suitable locations for FPPs in this country. However, designs are
under way for FPPs that can be deployed in the open ocean, up to 200 nautical miles offshore and in water as deep as 9 000
m, which would eliminate the wave problem.
There are reported to be more than 50 FPPs in use
around the world. The biggest is a 220-MW unit at
Mangalore in south-west India. Built in South Korea,
it is moored in a lagoon, and its design allows this
FPP to rise vertically by about 5 m to cope with the
dramatic increase in the water level during the monsoon season. And a 520-MW FPP is planned for New York City, which has no affordable land available for a new power station, but plenty of
water on which to float one.
An FPP is basically a power station mounted on a barge, and FPPs are generally constructed by shipbuilders. FPPs have been, and are, successfullly employed by countries in the Caribbean, South America and South-East Asia (especially the Philippines), in addition to India. Nor are they necessarily short-term options – one of
the first such FPPs, a30-MW unit named Impedence, was still in operation 50 years after it was built.
220 MW Combined Cycle FPP at Site
Russia, Germany to Float Mobile Power Stations by 2010 POWERnews February 11, 2009
Two revolutionary mobile power stations, developed separately by companies in Russia and Germany, could soon be afloat.
Russian investment management company United Industrial Corp. (Russian acronym OPK) said last week it is on track to launch
the world's first floating nuclear power station by 2010, while German power generation giant RWE could soon pilot a
combined-cycle gas turbine "power barge", deploying it at continental shores where electricity is most needed.
Russia's OPK said in a press release that it planned to complete the production of steam generators for its two-reactor floating
nuclear power station by 2009. The company had contracted Baltiysky Zavod, an OPK entity, to build all eight steam generators in
2006. Construction for the second set of generators was completed in October 2008.
About 450 feet long, OPK's floating nuclear power station is expected to have a total capacity of 70 MW (see "Russia's new nuclear
navy." POWER, July/August 2006). It will be located in the north of the Russian Federation where key energy supplies are lacking,
OPK said. The reactors' thermal energy can be sent up to 180 miles away. The plants' design life span is 40 years, with refueling
every two to three years. The project is said to have a 12-year payback.
RWE Power meanwhile announced this week that i would unveil a pilot "power barge" project - a combined-cycle gas turbine
power station that will be erected on floating pontoons - at the E-World-Energy & Water trade fail in Essen, Germany on Feb. 10.
When deployed - by 2010, the company hopes - the first RWE power barges would provide electricity to shortage-stricken
countries on the eastern Mediterranean and on the Black Sea.
Lambertz pointed out that the project is new to Europe, though beyond the continent, some 60 floating power plants with a total
capacity of more than 4 GW are already in operation. The largest of these is a 220-MW unit at Mangalore, in southwest India,
turbines, heavy fuel diesel engines and steam turbines." the maritime services provider says on it's web site.
Waller Marine is currently carrying out design work on an even larger project: a 520-MW combined-cycle facility that will provide
power to New York City. The company is also working on a modularized integrated gasification combined-cycle (IGCC) power
plant, which would be fueld by petcoke.
The RWE power barges, like other floating power plants, would not have their own propulsion systems but would be tugged to the
desired location. The 98-foot by 328-foot units would then be anchored and connected to the gas or electricity grid.
RWE Power has already started an EU-wide call for tenders for the pilot barge. "We are also looking for partner companies in the
target countries who can support us with expertise and local knowledge in selecting locations and the authorization procedure",
Lambertz said.
"We will be able to provide electricity quickly and reliably exactly where it is needed at a given time," explained Dr. Johannes
Lambertz, CEO of RWE Power, in a press release. "It is also a low risk way of exploring new growth markets for large projects on
land."
The original rational for the early FPP today remains fast track capacity where you need it at low financial risk, but new reasons are surfacing that are taking the FPP to higher levels of capacity and complexity.
Restricted, high demand areas, such as New York City, where land restrictions preclude power plant construction and additional transmission is limited, can accommodate FPPs. What will become the largest FPP in the world, a 520 MW combined cycle unit, using GE 7FA technology, currently in the permiting stage, is proposed for installation in this area in the near future.
The technical and commercial driver for this project is to
convert associated gas to an energy source that is more easily
transported to shore, there being certain technical limitations
to the installation of marginal gas pipelines in ultra deep water.
This concept of offshore FPPs may be expanded to provide
electrical power to offshore platforms and other production
units thus eliminating the need for platform based generation
and reducing overall emissions. This latter strategy is being
implemented in the Norwegian sector of the North Sea.
Additionally the concept can be extended to provide power to
future offshore installation, such as those contemplated for the
importation of LNG and CNG in the Gulf of Mexico.
The FPP, being of modular, transportable design is also finding application to land based power generation. Since the world shipbuilding industry trends toward the lowest cost producer, FPPs ar modular power plant units may be constructed in the shipyards of Korea, Japan or China.
Projects are being developed using barge structures
to support diesels, gas turbines and CFB boilers,
constructed in Asian shipyards for permanent land
including the United States. The use of low cost
labor and the efficiencies of machinery and
equipment installation produced in a shipbuilding
conventional plant installation in high cost countries.
Andrew Harville, a recent graduate of the Webb Institute, was recognized today as the 2009 winner of The Lloyd's Register Education Trust Maritime Technology Student of the Year Award.
The annual award, sponsored by the Lloyd's Trust and the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers (SNAME), is designed to highlight excellence while encouraging students to showcase their research and investigative studies on topics in the areas of naval architecture, marine and ocean engineering and promote leadership in the industry. It was presented to Harville (pictured above) at the SNAME 2009 President's Luncheon, held during the SNAME 2009 Annual Meeting and Expo in Providence, Rhode Island. The theme for this year's competition, open to undergraduate students in the US and Canada, was "Maritime Technology: Advancing Lifecycle Environmental Stewardship". The 2009 Webb graduate, now a naval architect with Waller Marine, Inc. in Spring, Texas, was honored with the US $3,500 first prize for his paper, "Politician Promises: A Study in Advancing a Green Staten Island (NY) Ferry System".
Beginning in 2010, the award will be re-named The Lloyd's Register Educational Trust America's maritime Student of the Year and the competition will be expanded to include students from Central and South America. "The Lloyd's Register Educational Trust is very pleased to further it's commitment to improving the quality and safety of the maritime industry worldwide by sponsoring this award." said Michael Franklin, Director, Lloyd's Register Educational Trust.
The theme for the 2010 competition is "A green ship or green system for safe operation in the ice and cold environment". Students have until December 1, 2009 to submit a declaration of interest and the deadline for submissions is March 31, 2010. Final judging will take place in June and the 2010 award will be presented at the SNAME 2010 annual meeting in Seattle next November. For more information and submissions, contact Alana Anderson at aanderson@sname.org or call 1+201.499.5066.
SNAME is an internationally recognized nonprofit Technical society of individual members serving eh maritime industry dedicated to advancing the art, science and practice of naval architecture, shipbuilding, ocean engineering and marine engineering. For more information visit www.sname.org.
Society of Naval Architects & Marine Engineers - 601 Pavonia Avenue - Jersey City, NJ 07306